Security by design.
Controls are designed into the architecture and the delivery pipeline rather than added at the end. We are comfortable working to your threat model, your review process and your auditors.
- Controls
- 7
- Review cadence
- Continuous
- Disclosure
- mysiet2@gmail.com
Engineered for the questions your security team will ask
Controls are designed into the architecture and the delivery pipeline — not bolted on at the end. We are happy to work to your threat model, not just ours.
Authentication
Multi-factor authentication, single sign-on and session controls verified at every request before any protected resource is reached.
Authorization
Role-based and attribute-based access rules evaluated centrally, so each user sees only the records their role permits.
Encryption
TLS in transit and AES-256 at rest, with key rotation managed separately from application code and access limited to managed services.
API Security
Input validation, schema enforcement and signed requests protect every public and internal endpoint from malformed or forged traffic.
Rate Limiting
Per-tenant quotas and adaptive throttling absorb bursts, protect downstream services and keep a single client from degrading everyone.
Monitoring
Structured logs, traces and alerts feed one operations view, so anomalies are detected and investigated before users report them.
Backups & Recovery
Automated encrypted backups with tested restore procedures and documented recovery objectives, exercised on a fixed schedule rather than assumed.
System status
demo panel- APIAll endpoints responding within target latencyOperational
- DatabaseReplication current, no replication lag detectedOperational
- SecurityThreat monitoring and access policies enforcedProtected
- MonitoringMetrics streaming from every production environmentActive
Illustrative status only. Production status pages are published per client engagement.
Responsible disclosure
Suspected vulnerabilities in any system we operate can be reported discreetly. We acknowledge reports within one business day and will never pursue a researcher acting in good faith.
mysiet2@gmail.comSecurity in the delivery pipeline
Controls are applied at each stage of delivery, not audited once at the end. Every stage produces evidence you can review.
Threat model during architecture
Before implementation we identify the assets worth protecting, the realistic threats and the controls that respond to them, and record the trade-offs.
Dependency and secret scanning in CI
Every change is checked for known vulnerable dependencies and committed secrets. A failing scan blocks the pipeline rather than raising a ticket.
Least-privilege environments
Applications, build agents and engineers hold only the access each task requires, with production access audited and time-bound.
Pre-release review and rollback plan
Security-relevant changes are reviewed before release, and every deployment has a tested rollback path and a named person accountable for it.
How data is protected
A consistent set of defaults across every system we build, adjustable where a client's own policy is stricter.
Encryption at rest and in transit
TLS for every connection and encryption for stored data, with keys managed outside application code and rotated on a defined schedule.
Tenant isolation
Logical isolation between tenants, with access rules evaluated per request so one customer's data is never reachable from another.
Retention and deletion
Retention periods agreed per engagement, enforced by scheduled jobs, with a documented and tested deletion path when data reaches end of life.
Audit logging
Security-relevant events recorded with actor, action and timestamp in append-only logs, retained for investigation and review.
Compliance posture
We work to the framework your organisation is held to. We do not claim certifications we do not hold.
Most clients arrive with a framework already imposed on them, whether that is an internal security policy, a procurement questionnaire or a sector regulation. Our approach is to treat those requirements as engineering inputs rather than paperwork: they shape the data model, the access rules and the evidence the system produces.
- We map each control in your framework to a concrete implementation or a documented compensating control.
- We produce the evidence your reviewers ask for, in the form your process expects.
- We flag gaps honestly and early, rather than discovering them during an audit.
- We support third-party penetration tests against systems we build and operate.
Where a requirement cannot be met within the agreed architecture, we say so before the build starts and propose the closest responsible alternative.
Report a vulnerability
If you believe you have found a security issue in a system we operate, we want to hear about it and we will treat the report seriously.
Report the issue by email with enough detail to reproduce it. If you are unsure whether something qualifies, send it anyway and we will tell you.
mysiet2@gmail.comDemo disclosure policyHow we handle reports
- Email the address below with a description, the system affected and enough detail to reproduce the issue.
- We acknowledge every report within one business day and keep you updated while we investigate.
- We will not pursue or report a researcher who acts in good faith and does not access, alter or disclose customer data.
- We ask for reasonable time to remediate before any public write-up, and we credit reporters who wish to be named.
Need a security review?
We can review an existing system, threat-model a design before build, or join your assurance process as the engineering counterpart.